Pint Please Logo
Apple app store logoGoogle play store logo
Drunk Beard
152 notes
Drunk Beard
Morrens, Switzerland


Est-ce votre brasserie ?
Enregistrez votre brasserie GRATUITEMENT et contrôler votre présentation sur Pint Please !
Enregistrer votre brasserie

Avis

Post author: WexiLahti
WexiLahti
@ Drinks of the World, Geneva
6 months ago
2.7
Turbid, pale orange beer with ridiculous carbonation unlocks a shooting froth rocket that first fills the entire glass with soapy foam. The foam keeps ascending from the can for a long time. I can also spot multiple minuscule yeast particles floating in the beer. ▪️ ▪️ ▪️ [I need time to let the beer settle down.] ▪️ ▪️ ▪️ The nose recognizes fermented grapefruit, even marginally stale, canned mandarin, moderate oat flakes and a metallic vibe. Doesn't seem to be okay. I check the best before: canned 12/04/23 and best before 01/24. Should still be all fine but... my sensory assessment tells a different story. The taste is not too inviting but better than what I should anticipate based on the scent. I receive heavy lemon pulp, pith and peel, grapefruit zest, peach and a hint of passionfruit. The hops are Idaho 7 and Motueka. Obviously not a match made in heaven. The body clocks light. The finish lives fast with citruses and some juicier tropical notes, and dies really young. I'll be waiting there with my tastebuds unfurled, waiting just for the aftertaste; welcome to my world. The mouthfeel is light, zesty, smooth, a bit tropical and messy. Too much effervescence ruins a lot here. The dates are on the safe side but something is wrong here: the massive froth, floating yeast, scent and taste all give an unappealing impression. Some kind of failure.

Post author: WexiLahti
WexiLahti
@ Drinks of the World, Geneva
6 months ago
3.8
This beer is interesting: it has been enhanced with PHANTASM. Phantasm is a powder derived from Marlborough Sauvignon Blanc grapes in New Zealand. It's an organic compound high in aromatic molecules called thiols. To cut a long scientific story short, the idea of applying Phantasm in brewing is to enhance the aroma of the beer, make juicy even more juicy. (Just google more if interested). This is very likely my first ever Phantasm beer. The beer shows a foggy, pale yellow face. Carbonation is rich but not overwhelming. A regular, off-white head emerges on the top up to the level of two fingers. Short retention. Now, I should expect an intensive tropical nectar in my nose. Do I get it? Well, the elements include pineapple, orange, tangerine, lychee, maybe a bit of mango as well. The cocktail is very tropical. I also get something sweet as if lactose although the beer doesn't contain lactose. Very juicy indeed!  💛💛 Hope the same trajectory can be spotted on the tongue, as well. Pineapple is ample. Tangerine and orange merge with lychee and a suggestion of coconut. Lemon pulp joins the spectacle. The malty side wants to remain in the background but both oat flakes and wheat bun can be picked. I admit that the profile is juicy but not abundantly so anyway. I've had so many juicier and definitely more tropical beers that haven't been "viagraized" with Phantasm. Obviously you can get the same result with a copious load of fruity hops, and go even beyond what the Phantasm offers in this beer. The body is medium. The end is citrusy and pineappley, some of the previous components carry over to the finishing line, some others don't. Not much different though. Fear of the dark, I have a constant fear that the aftertaste's always near; fear of the dark, fear of the dark, I have a phobia that the aftertaste's always there. The mouthfeel is medium, rather soft, smooth, juicy, a tad nectar-like and tropical. It's even modestly candy-like, which is interesting for sure! Yet also a bit dry and drying. All in all, a palatable juicy piece but nothing phenomenal. I've had multiple better New England IPAs of various strengths. Phantasm here doesn't prove to be particularly phantastic. Therefore, I snatch 0.2 stars away from the rating.

Post author: Quentin M
Quentin M
6 months ago
3.2
Bonne bière avec des notes d'agrumes et un bonne dose de fruits tropicaux, surtout des fruitsde la passion, le tout est bien équilibré et plutôt rond en bouche

Post author: Quentin M
Quentin M
6 months ago
3.3
Bonne bière avec des notes d'agrumes, de fruits tropicaux, le tout est bien sucré et bien rond

Post author: Guillaume Hirtz
Guillaume Hirtz
@ Craft beer festival Strasbourg
6 months ago
4.2
Une très bonne impérial stout, un bon goût de torréfaction et de cacao, le tiramisu est très très léger, je sens vraiment plus du café. C’est vraiment bon.

Post author: Roby1965
Roby1965
7 months ago
4.2
Un nez fruité, en bouche on retrouve des notes de fruits exotiques, de pêche, on a un houblonnage très parfumé, de la longueur en bouche, un très bel équilibre, de la puissance, une très belle NEIPA.

Post author: Roby1965
Roby1965
7 months ago
3.8
Une couleur de NEIPA, une fine mousse abondante, un nez fruité et frais, en bouche on retrouve ces notes fruitées, une pointe d'agrumes, le houblonnage est très parfumé, je m'attendais à plus de puissance et de longueur en bouche, mais ça reste une très belle IPA.